Skip to main content

Hearing Loop Installation and the Equality Act: What an Installer Should Hand Over

Hearing Loop Installation and the Equality Act: What an Installer Should Hand Over

The Equality Act never mentions a hearing loop. It asks for reasonable adjustments, and a loop is one common answer. Here’s what the Act says and what a good hearing loop installation includes.

Illustrative diagram: hearing loop installation with a perimeter loop cable around the seating and the 0 dB reference of 400 mA/m and the average speech level of about 100 mA/m marked
A perimeter loop and the two levels in BS EN IEC 60118-4: the 400 mA/m reference and the average speech level of about 100 mA/m. Illustrative only.

Hearing loop installation isn’t something the Equality Act 2010 spells out. Section 20 asks for reasonable steps to provide an auxiliary aid where a disabled person would otherwise be at a substantial disadvantage, and a loop is one common way to do that. What counts as reasonable depends on your building and your service.

This post is not legal advice. It sets out the statute wording we checked, the standard an installer should commission against, and what a good job looks like. We last checked the sources in October 2026.

What the Equality Act says about hearing loop installation

Section 20 sets out a duty made up of three requirements. The third is the one that matters here. Where a disabled person would, but for an auxiliary aid, be put at a substantial disadvantage, section 20(5) requires you to take such steps as it is reasonable to have to take to provide that aid. Section 20(11) adds that an auxiliary aid includes an auxiliary service.

Section 29 applies the duty to service providers, and section 29(7)(a) says so directly. Schedule 2 then says that for services, the reference to a disabled person in section 20(3), (4) or (5) is to disabled persons generally. In effect, you can’t wait for a named complaint before you think about it. That’s our reading, not the statute’s own phrase.

Paragraph 2(7) of the same schedule says a service provider needn’t take a step that would fundamentally alter the nature of the service or the nature of its trade or profession. The Act applies across Great Britain. It never uses the words “induction loop”, and no section prescribes a hearing loop. “Reasonable” gets judged case by case, so a village hall and a large auditorium will land in different places.

The Equality and Human Rights Commission publishes a statutory Code of Practice on services. A 2026 edition is now on GOV.UK, so check you’re reading the current one before you quote it to anyone.

Who a hearing loop helps, and where it falls short

A hearing loop installation helps people whose hearing aids or implants have a telecoil, and only those people. RNID says over 18 million adults in the UK are deaf, have hearing loss or tinnitus, and that figure includes tinnitus. It also estimates 2.4 million adults have hearing loss that makes most conversational speech hard to follow. Not all of them will have a telecoil, and not all of them will know how to switch it on.

The ABTT’s 2013 guide to hearing assistance in UK auditoria gives a fair summary of the trade-offs. Loops are comparatively easy to install, relatively low in cost and can be discreet. The downsides are electrical and magnetic noise, especially from lighting control equipment, audio quality that isn’t always good, and large or variable seating that is hard to cover. Infrared systems avoid the magnetic noise. They need line of sight, receivers, chargers and someone to manage them.

Bluetooth Auracast is the newer option. The Bluetooth SIG says loops and telecoils have long been the standard for assistive listening in public spaces, and that Auracast broadcast audio can send sound from PA systems and TVs straight to hearing aids, with supporting products now coming onto the market. We’d treat it as emerging and complementary. We aren’t giving dates, because we haven’t seen any we trust.

What BS EN IEC 60118-4 covers

The current designation we found is BS EN IEC 60118-4:2015+A1:2018, and BSI lists it as current, published 30 April 2018. We checked in October 2026 and found no newer edition. Its title is Electroacoustics, Hearing aids, Induction-loop systems for hearing aid purposes, System performance requirements.

The standard sets requirements for field strength in audio-frequency induction loops used with telecoil hearing aids. It also covers minimum frequency response, measurement methods, a check of magnetic background noise on site, the useful volume of the field and commissioning steps. It doesn’t cover loop driver amplifiers. Those fall under IEC 62489-1.

You’ll often see a “400 mA/m target” quoted. That’s a simplification. In the standard, 400 mA/m is the 0 dB reference. The long-term average speech level is about 100 mA/m, which is minus 12 dB against that reference. We haven’t quoted tolerances, background noise limits or measurement heights, because the secondary sources we read disagree. Read the standard or ask the installer to show you the figures they commissioned to.

What a good hearing loop installation includes

A good hearing loop installation starts with a survey, and a cable drum comes later. The installer should measure background magnetic interference with a field strength meter, look for metal in the floor and choose a loop type. A perimeter loop can spill a long way outside the room. A joint design guide from two loop manufacturers says up to four times the loop width. Phased array loops cut that spill, to about 1.2 m from the edge in that guide. It also says steel rebar or pan decking soaks up field at the top of the frequency range, and extra amplifier power won’t fix that.

Next comes the driver, matched to the loop and set up for any metal loss. Then cabling, kept clear of other cables. The same design guide gives 61 cm from parallel voice, data or mains wiring. Buried cable should be marked on the drawings.

Commissioning comes last, and it’s where jobs get skipped. The installer measures with a calibrated meter against BS EN IEC 60118-4, records the results and issues a certificate. Signs go up at each loop-served area so users know to switch to the telecoil setting. In our view, an installer who can’t show you the measured results hasn’t finished the job.

Where loops fail after handover

Most failures after a hearing loop installation are boring. The amplifier’s unplugged, or the source was never routed to it. Microphone gain was set for an empty, quiet room and nobody revisited it when the room filled. Someone fits new dimmers or screens after commissioning, and the interference changes. Then nobody can say what normal sounded like, because the test was never written down.

The fix is routine. Hearing Link guidance says a basic listening test should be done on a regular basis and before events, with a more thorough check normally done annually by a specialist loop supplier. If staff can’t say where the loop is and how to test it, you have a loop in name only. Fold the annual check into your AV maintenance contract so it doesn’t slip. Plan for the day it fails too. The ABTT guide says to tell staff and post notices when a loop is out of action before an event, so users aren’t left guessing at the door.

Questions to put to an installer

Before you sign, put these to the installer:

  • Which loop type are you proposing, and why? What will the hearing loop installation cover and what won’t it?
  • Will I get the measured results and a certificate at handover, with the standard and its edition named on it?
  • Who tests the loop, and how often?
  • What signs do you supply, and what should staff do when the loop fails before an event?
  • What happens if we change the room later?

Floors matter in any hearing loop installation. Our places of worship page notes that metal in floors complicates loops, and the same applies in many modern meeting spaces. For a real example, the induction hearing loop in our Scottish Fire and Rescue Service Cambuslang auditorium covers the whole auditorium.

See our Meeting Room AV page for the wider audio picture. We design and install from Glasgow, and we’ll tell you straight if a loop isn’t what your room needs.

The bottom line: The Act asks for reasonable steps and names no technology, so judge a hearing loop installation by what you can measure. Ask for readings against BS EN IEC 60118-4 at handover, then test it before every event.
Questions worth asking

FAQ

Is a hearing loop a legal requirement?

The Equality Act doesn’t mention hearing loops. It requires reasonable steps to provide an auxiliary aid where a disabled person would otherwise be at a substantial disadvantage, and what is reasonable depends on your premises and your service. For your own position, take legal advice. This post is not legal advice.

How much does hearing loop installation cost?

It depends on room size, loop type, metal in the floor and how many areas you need to cover. We haven’t got a sourced price to quote, so we won’t invent one. Ask for a quote that follows a survey.

How do I know if my hearing loop installation works?

Ask for the commissioning record that shows measured results against the standard. Staff should do a basic listening test regularly and before events, and a specialist should check it annually. If you have no test record, you don’t yet know.

Do hearing aids need a special setting for a loop?

Yes. The hearing aid needs a telecoil, switched on with the T setting or the equivalent programme. Without one, a loop does nothing for the wearer, which is why signs and staff awareness matter.

Are hearing loops being replaced by Bluetooth?

Not that we can see. The Bluetooth SIG describes Auracast as a way to send audio from PA systems, TVs and other sources direct to hearing aids, with supporting products now arriving. We’d treat it as complementary for now and give no dates.

Which standard should a hearing loop be tested against?

BS EN IEC 60118-4:2015+A1:2018 is the current edition we found when we checked in October 2026. It covers field strength, frequency response, measurement methods and commissioning. Loop driver amplifiers are covered by a different standard, IEC 62489-1.

Not sure if your loop works, or if you need one?

Tell us about the room and what you’ve got now, and we’ll give you a straight answer.

๐Ÿ“ž 0845 095 3600   โœ‰ av@efficient-is.co.uk

Book a discovery call

Meeting Room Booking System and Wireless Presentation: What to Check Before You Buy

Meeting Room Booking System and Wireless Presentation: What to Check Before You Buy

Ghost bookings and failed screen sharing are the two meeting room complaints we hear most. Both come down to what sits behind the wall and on the network.

Illustrative diagram: how a meeting room booking system checks in and auto-releases a room, with a default 10 minute check-in window and four check-in routes in Microsoft Places
How a meeting room booking system releases an unclaimed room. The 10 minute window is the Microsoft Places default and can be changed.

A meeting room booking system earns its money by freeing rooms that nobody turned up for. Microsoft Places can release a booked room automatically if nobody checks in, and the default window is 10 minutes. That only works if each room has a way to check in, and the panel, licence and network behind it are in place.

How a meeting room booking system stops ghost bookings

It asks people to confirm they’ve arrived, then releases the room if they don’t. Microsoft’s documentation describes four ways to check in: the Teams panel at the door, the join button on a Teams Rooms console, the Teams meeting chat, or email. The release window defaults to 10 minutes and can be changed. Microsoft’s example sets 20 minutes through a setting called PostReservationMaxClaimTimeInMinutes.

Three details catch people out. Changes can take up to 48 hours to apply. The panel check-in needs a recent Teams panel app version, which Microsoft lists. And licensing matters: Teams Premium bought before 1 April 2026, or a space licence (Teams Rooms or Shared Space) on the room. The page was updated on 25 August 2026.

Microsoft recommends limiting auto-release to rooms that have a panel or a Teams Rooms device. That’s sound advice, since a room with no way to check in can only release itself on a guess. In our view 10 minutes is tight for a boardroom hosting external guests who sign in at reception, so lengthen the window there.

We haven’t found a verified figure for how many bookings go unclaimed, and vendor percentages in search results don’t come with methods. Measure your own: compare booked hours with occupancy for a month before you buy any meeting room booking system.

What a meeting room booking system needs behind the wall

A booking panel is a small networked computer, and it needs a data point, power over Ethernet and a place on the right VLAN. Our room booking systems page describes door and desk panels that sync with Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace, with check-in and auto-release for ghost bookings. It also covers occupancy sensors.

In our experience the cabling is where budgets slip. A panel beside the door needs a cable run to that exact spot. On a new build that’s a line on the containment drawing. In an occupied office it’s surface trunking or a ceiling void and a night visit. Ask for the data point locations on the quote, and for the licences and network work to be priced as separate lines.

Sensors add a second signal. A booking says someone intends to use the room. A sensor says someone is in it. Combined, they let you release a room that nobody has entered, and they give you honest utilisation data. Ask what the sensor reports and where that data goes. Find out who can see it, and whether the occupancy figures are anonymous counts or tied to named people in the calendar. That changes the privacy conversation with your staff.

Security and the Windows 10 question

Rooms with Teams Rooms devices come with their own identity rules. Microsoft’s guidance on conditional access says the management feature needs a Teams Rooms Pro licence and Entra ID P1, which is included. It says not to require interactive MFA for room resource accounts, and to exclude them from any policy that needs a person to sign in. It also says to apply Intune compliance to both devices and resource accounts, so read the full Microsoft guidance with your identity team.

If your room PCs still run Windows 10, that’s a bigger issue than the booking layer. Microsoft doesn’t support Teams Rooms on Windows devices placed on ESU, and builds 10.0.19045 or lower need Windows 11 or a replacement. We cover that in our note on the Windows 10 ESU cost for AV PCs. Check the room accounts too, since Microsoft’s guidance treats them separately from the devices. Fix the PCs first, then add the meeting room booking system on top.

Why wireless presentation fails on a managed network

It usually fails because discovery doesn’t cross the network boundary. One vendor documents AirPlay discovery as using mDNS on UDP port 5353 at 224.0.0.251. That vendor’s knowledge base, written for one receiver product, says multicast typically doesn’t cross VLANs without an mDNS reflector or Bonjour gateway. Our own wireless presentation page says the same about multicast discovery.

That vendor page lists the other usual causes. Access point client isolation has to be off. Multicast has to be allowed on the client SSID. Blocked ports can leave you with a black screen or audio-only mirroring. The symptom is usually the same: the laptop doesn’t see the room, and the person presenting blames the receiver when the fault sits on the network behind it.

The fix is a network job, so settle it at design stage. Decide where the receivers live, which VLAN guests and staff join, and who runs the reflector. We haven’t checked in detail how Miracast and Google Cast behave across your network, so test every protocol your people use before sign-off.

Guests, BYOD and keeping a wired fallback

Wireless presentation often gets bought alongside a meeting room booking system, since both touch the same rooms and the same network. People bring whatever they have. AirPlay, Miracast, Google Cast and USB-C all turn up. Our wireless presentation page covers all four, including guest sharing that doesn’t need the visitor to join your corporate network.

Treat the receiver as a networked device. It has an address, firmware and a management page, so it belongs on your asset list and your update schedule. If you hold Cyber Essentials, ask your assessor how it should be scoped. Our guide to Cyber Essentials and Cyber Essentials Plus explains the two levels.

A visitor’s laptop may run any of those four, and not every receiver supports all of them, so check the protocol list against the devices your own people carry. Keep an HDMI or USB-C cable on the table for the day wireless lets you down.

What to ask a supplier before you buy

Start with the calendar. Find out which one the system syncs with, and whether it needs Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace licences on top. Then ask for the check-in method in each room, and who sets the release window. Each panel needs a data point, PoE and a VLAN, so ask what it wants on the wall.

On the wireless side, ask how guests present without joining the staff network, which protocols are supported and who tests them on your network. Ask what support costs and who answers when a panel goes blank. Our meeting room AV team can sit in on those calls. Get the answers in writing and compare them side by side. A supplier who can’t say how check-in works in a given room hasn’t thought about that room yet. Ask to see a live installation on a network like yours, with a guest laptop on it.

See our Room Booking Systems, Wireless Presentation and Meeting Room AV pages.

The bottom line: Decide the check-in method for each room before you choose a meeting room booking system. Then test wireless presentation on your own network, with a cable still on the table.
Questions worth asking

FAQ

What is a ghost booking?

It’s a room reserved in the calendar that nobody uses. The room shows as busy, so other people can’t book it. Check-in with auto-release is the usual fix.

How long should a room be held before auto-release?

A meeting room booking system built on Microsoft Places defaults to 10 minutes, and you can change that. Microsoft’s example uses 20. Boardrooms with external guests may need longer than open meeting rooms.

Does a meeting room booking system need a panel outside every room?

Microsoft recommends limiting auto-release to rooms with a panel or a Teams Rooms device. Without one, there’s no obvious way to check in. Rooms without either can still be booked and measured.

Can guests share their screen without joining the corporate wifi?

Our wireless presentation page describes guest sharing that doesn’t need the visitor on your corporate network. How a particular unit does that varies, so ask the supplier to demonstrate it on your network.

Why can’t an iPhone find the wireless display?

Discovery for AirPlay uses multicast, and one vendor documents that it typically doesn’t cross VLANs without a reflector. Client isolation on the access point can also block it. Check both.

Do we still need an HDMI cable in the room?

Yes. Wireless sharing depends on the network and on the guest’s device. A fixed cable is the fallback that still works when either lets you down.

Ghost bookings or screen sharing driving you mad?

Tell us how many rooms you have and what’s going wrong, and we’ll tell you what to fix first.

๐Ÿ“ž 0845 095 3600   โœ‰ av@efficient-is.co.uk

Book a discovery call

Microsoft Teams Rooms vs Zoom Rooms: Which Should Your Meeting Rooms Run?

Teams Rooms or Zoom Rooms? The platform your company already uses usually decides it.

This decision looks like a technology choice. It’s actually an org-chart question, which platform does your business already run meetings on.

Comparison table of Microsoft Teams Rooms vs Zoom Rooms features

Why this is rarely a close call

If your organisation already runs on Microsoft 365, a certified Microsoft Teams Rooms system is almost always the right default, it integrates natively with the calendar, licensing and admin tools you already have. The same logic applies in reverse for organisations standardised on Zoom. Choosing the platform your staff don’t already use daily just adds a second login and a second set of habits to learn.

The bit that actually matters more: interoperability

Industry surveys now regularly put the share of meetings with at least one remote participant at 70% or more: and a meaningful share of those involve someone joining from a different platform than the room is built for. That’s why interoperability, not platform loyalty, has become the defining meeting-room AV priority: a well-specified room should let a Zoom-only external guest join a Teams-native meeting without anyone in the room noticing the difference.

Certified room hardware from Logitech, Yealink, Poly and others is increasingly built platform-agnostic for exactly this reason, the same physical camera and audio bar running Teams in one room and Zoom in the next, switched at the compute layer rather than the hardware.

Sizing the room correctly

Huddle rooms (2 to 6 people) generally need one all-in-one video bar and nothing more elaborate. Mid-size meeting rooms (6 to 14 people) benefit from a dedicated room PC or compute puck rather than relying on someone’s laptop. Larger boardrooms need multiple cameras or an auto-framing wide-angle system so remote participants aren’t staring at the back of someone’s head for an hour.

The bottom line: Match the room to the platform your organisation already runs on, specify hardware that stays interoperable for guests joining from elsewhere, and size the camera/audio setup to the room, not the other way round.
Questions worth asking

FAQ

Should we choose Microsoft Teams Rooms or Zoom Rooms?

In most cases, whichever platform your organisation already uses for daily meetings, the value is in native calendar and licensing integration, not the hardware itself.

What if guests join from a different platform than our room is set up for?

Well-specified modern room hardware is largely platform-agnostic at the hardware layer, so a Teams-native room can generally host a Zoom guest without anyone noticing a difference.

Certified hardware, and why the tier matters

Both Microsoft and Zoom operate certification programmes for room hardware, and not every device sold for meeting rooms carries a full certification. Certified hardware has been through the platform’s own compatibility and performance testing, giving a reasonable guarantee that camera framing, audio pickup and firmware updates will keep working reliably as the platform itself evolves. Uncertified or generically compatible hardware can still function, but any issues that surface later are harder to get support for, since neither the room hardware vendor nor the platform provider will necessarily take ownership of a fault outside their certified combinations.

What installation actually covers beyond the hardware

A proper meeting room AV installation is not just mounting a camera and a screen. It includes provisioning the room account correctly within the organisation’s tenant, confirming the network can support the bandwidth and quality of service a video call needs, and testing the room end to end with a real call before staff rely on it for the first time. Skipping this step is the most common reason a room that looks correctly installed still frustrates the first team that tries to use it.

Have a project in mind?

Tell us what you’re trying to fix and we’ll tell you honestly what’s realistic.

๐Ÿ“ž 0845 095 3600  ·  โœ‰ av@efficient-is.co.uk

Book a discovery call

The Meeting Room AV Checklist for 2026

Corporate · 3 min read

Most “broken” meeting rooms aren’t actually broken, they’re just badly specified

The most common complaint about meeting room AV isn’t a hardware failure. It’s friction, too many steps between walking in and actually starting the meeting.

Meeting room AV checklist covering displays, one-touch join, camera framing and microphone coverage

One-touch join is no longer optional

Staff now expect to walk into a room and start a call within seconds, not spend the first five minutes of a meeting hunting for the right cable or app. Wireless presentation and one-touch join off the calendar system have moved from nice-to-have to baseline expectation across UK offices in the last couple of years.

Interoperability across platforms

With most enterprise meetings now including a remote participant, and a meaningful share of those joining from a different platform than the room is built for, interoperable hardware, able to run Teams, Zoom or Google Meet without a different physical setup each time, has become one of the defining priorities for corporate meeting room AV specification.

Room booking, properly integrated

A room-booking panel that doesn’t sync properly with the calendar system creates exactly the problem it’s meant to solve, double-bookings, rooms shown as free that aren’t, and staff losing trust in the system within weeks. Integration with Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace calendars should be tested thoroughly before rollout, not assumed to work out of the box.

Standardise across rooms, don’t bespoke each one

Organisations that standardise meeting room technology across room sizes and office locations see meaningfully better adoption and lower ongoing support overhead than those treating every room as a bespoke project. A huddle-room kit, a mid-size room kit and a boardroom kit, three configurations, consistently applied, beats a different bespoke setup in every room.

The bottom line: Prioritise one-touch join and cross-platform interoperability over any single feature, integrate room booking properly before rollout, and standardise configurations across room sizes rather than bespoking each room.
Questions worth asking

FAQ

Do you support multi-site corporate rollouts across the UK?

Yes, design and project management are handled centrally, with installation delivered by our engineers in Scotland or a vetted local partner, UK-wide.

Should we standardise meeting room AV across all our offices?

Generally yes, a small number of consistent room configurations (huddle, mid-size, boardroom) is easier to support and gets adopted faster than bespoke setups per room.

What often gets overlooked in the initial spec

Acoustic treatment is one of the most commonly overlooked elements in meeting room AV planning. A room with hard, reflective surfaces, glass walls, bare ceilings, can make even well-specified microphones and speakers sound poor to remote participants, regardless of how good the actual hardware is. A basic acoustic assessment alongside the AV specification, checking reverberation and background noise rather than assuming any room will sound fine once equipment is installed, avoids paying for good hardware that gets undermined by the room itself.

Cable management and future serviceability are worth planning for at design stage too, not left as an afterthought. Properly containerised, labelled cabling with accessible routes for future changes means adding a camera, replacing a display, or troubleshooting a fault later does not mean disrupting the room or its finishes. Rooms specified without this in mind often end up with cables run externally or hidden in ways that make any future change disproportionately disruptive.

Lighting control, ensuring cameras get consistent, flattering exposure across the day rather than only when natural light happens to be favourable, is a small addition at design stage that meaningfully improves how a room performs on video calls.

Testing the finished room with an actual remote participant, not just staff physically present, before declaring it complete catches issues that internal walkthroughs regularly miss, since it is only from the remote end that audio and camera framing problems actually become obvious.

Have a project in mind?

Tell us what you’re trying to fix and we’ll tell you honestly what’s realistic.

๐Ÿ“ž 0845 095 3600  ·  โœ‰ av@efficient-is.co.uk

Book a discovery call

Find our work useful? Add us as a preferred source on Google.